LIVE
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
SONNET 4.6$3 / $15per Mtok
GPT-5.5$10 / $30per Mtok
GEMINI 3.1$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
VALS FINANCEleader Opus 4.764.4%
AFTAv1.0 whitepaper live at /whitepaper
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
SONNET 4.6$3 / $15per Mtok
GPT-5.5$10 / $30per Mtok
GEMINI 3.1$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
VALS FINANCEleader Opus 4.764.4%
AFTAv1.0 whitepaper live at /whitepaper
All systems operational0 AI providers monitored, polled every 2 minutes
Live status

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.8 on May 28, 2026, just six weeks after Opus 4.7. Pricing held steady at $15 input and $75 output per million tokens, and the 1 million token context window carries over unchanged. The gains are in capability and economics: Anthropic's own numbers put agentic coding at 69.2% (up from 64.3%), knowledge work at 1890 (up from 1753), and agentic financial analysis at 53.9% (up from 51.5%), while the new fast mode runs roughly 2.5x quicker and about three times cheaper than before. Anthropic also frames 4.8 as more honest about its own progress and better at working independently for longer. Here is the full generational diff.

Category Breakdown

Agentic codingClaude Opus 4.8

Opus 4.8 scores 69.2% vs 4.7 at 64.3% on Anthropic's agentic coding measure

Knowledge workClaude Opus 4.8

Opus 4.8 posts 1890 vs 4.7 at 1753 on Anthropic's knowledge work score

Reasoning with toolsClaude Opus 4.8

Opus 4.8 reaches 57.9% vs 4.7 at 54.7% on multidisciplinary reasoning with tools

Agentic computer useClaude Opus 4.8

Opus 4.8 reaches 83.4% vs 4.7 at 82.8%

Agentic financial analysisClaude Opus 4.8

Opus 4.8 improves to 53.9% from 4.7 at 51.5%

Fast modeClaude Opus 4.8

Opus 4.8 fast mode is roughly 2.5x faster and about 3x cheaper than the previous fast mode

PricingTieTie

Both cost $15 input and $75 output per 1M tokens

Context windowTieTie

Both ship a 1 million token context window

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 when:

  • Agentic coding and long-running asynchronous workflows
  • Tasks that benefit from higher effort settings (extra or max)
  • Workloads where the cheaper, faster fast mode lowers cost
  • Teams that want the most honest progress reporting
View Claude Opus 4.8 details

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • Existing prompts and evals already tuned to 4.7 behavior
  • Version-pinned enterprise contracts
  • Regression testing against the prior generation
  • Workloads where 4.7 already meets quality and latency targets
View Claude Opus 4.7 details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Opus 4.7?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic excels at agentic coding and long-running asynchronous workflows, while Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic is better for existing prompts and evals already tuned to 4.7 behavior. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does Claude Opus 4.8 cost compared to Claude Opus 4.7?

Check the pricing table above for current per-token costs for both models.

What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Opus 4.7?

See the specs table above for current context window sizes.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide