LIVE
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms

o3-mini vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Both o3-mini and Claude Sonnet 4.6 sit at the mid-tier price point but solve different problems. o3-mini is OpenAI's reasoning specialist, optimized for math, science, and chain-of-thought workloads at a third the cost of GPT-5.5. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's balanced generalist, comparable on most general tasks at a similar price point but with stronger code generation and the same 200K context as Opus.

Head-to-Head Specs

Speco3-miniClaude Sonnet 4.6
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Input Price$1.10/1M$3.00/1M
Output Price$4.40/1M$15.00/1M
Context Window200K200K
Released2025-012026-03
Capabilitiestext, reasoning, codetext, vision, tool-use, code

Benchmark Scores

Benchmarko3-miniClaude Sonnet 4.6Winner
MMLU-Pro86.388.7Claude
HumanEval89.792.0Claude
GPQA Diamond60.365.8Claude
MATH87.185.4o3-mini
SWE-bench49.355.7Claude

See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.

Category Breakdown

General reasoning (MMLU-Pro)Claude Sonnet 4.6

Sonnet 4.6 at 88.7 vs o3-mini at 86.3

Code generation (HumanEval)Claude Sonnet 4.6

Sonnet 4.6 at 92.0 vs o3-mini at 89.7

SWE-benchClaude Sonnet 4.6

Sonnet 4.6 at 55.7 vs o3-mini at 49.3

Matho3-mini

o3-mini at 87.1 vs Sonnet 4.6 at 85.4. Reasoning specialist edges out.

Graduate-level science (GPQA)Claude Sonnet 4.6

Sonnet 4.6 at 65.8 vs o3-mini at 60.3

Pricingo3-mini

o3-mini at $1.10/$4.40 vs Sonnet 4.6 at $3/$15. ~3x cheaper.

Context windowClaude Sonnet 4.6

Sonnet 4.6 has 200K vs o3-mini at 200K. Tie on size; Anthropic's long-context recall is generally stronger.

Choose o3-mini when:

  • Math and quantitative reasoning workloads
  • Cost-sensitive applications where mid-tier is the budget ceiling
  • OpenAI ecosystem and Assistants API integrations
  • Chain-of-thought reasoning patterns
View o3-mini details

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when:

  • Code generation and software-engineering agents
  • Long-document analysis and research synthesis
  • Anthropic's tool-use semantics and MCP integration
  • Workloads that benefit from balanced generalist quality
View Claude Sonnet 4.6 details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, o3-mini or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

It depends on your use case. o3-mini from OpenAI excels at math and quantitative reasoning workloads, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 from Anthropic is better for code generation and software-engineering agents. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does o3-mini cost compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6?

o3-mini costs $1.10 input and $4.40 output per 1M tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 input and $15.00 output per 1M tokens.

What is the context window difference between o3-mini and Claude Sonnet 4.6?

o3-mini supports 200K tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide