LIVE
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms

Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

The two strongest open-weight models in 2026 sit head-to-head: Meta's Llama 4 Maverick and DeepSeek's V4 Pro. Both ship with permissive licenses that allow commercial use and self-hosting. DeepSeek V4 Pro edges Maverick on most benchmarks, particularly graduate-level science and math, but Maverick has the larger ecosystem of fine-tuned variants, runtime support across cloud partners, and a broader toolchain.

Head-to-Head Specs

SpecLlama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V4 Pro
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Input PriceFree/1M$1.74/1M
Output PriceFree/1M$3.48/1M
Context Window1M1M
Released2025-042026-04
Capabilitiestext, vision, codetext, vision, code, reasoning

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V4 ProWinner
MMLU-Pro89.391.5DeepSeek
HumanEval91.794.8DeepSeek
GPQA Diamond64.173.1DeepSeek
MATH86.792.4DeepSeek
SWE-bench52.863.8DeepSeek

See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.

Category Breakdown

General reasoning (MMLU-Pro)DeepSeek V4 Pro

V4 Pro at 91.5 vs Maverick at 89.3

Code generation (HumanEval)DeepSeek V4 Pro

V4 Pro at 94.8 vs Maverick at 91.7

SWE-benchDeepSeek V4 Pro

V4 Pro at 63.8 vs Maverick at 52.8

Graduate-level science (GPQA)DeepSeek V4 Pro

V4 Pro at 73.1 vs Maverick at 64.1

MathDeepSeek V4 Pro

V4 Pro at 92.4 vs Maverick at 86.7

LicenseTieTie

Both permit commercial use and self-hosting under permissive terms.

EcosystemLlama 4 Maverick

Llama has a much larger fine-tune and adapter community via Hugging Face.

PricingTieTie

Both are free to self-host; partner-API pricing varies by host.

Choose Llama 4 Maverick when:

  • Largest fine-tune ecosystem matters for your domain
  • Llama-Guard, Llama-Stack, and other Meta tooling fits your stack
  • Wider support across Together, Fireworks, Groq, Cerebras, AWS Bedrock
  • Multimodal applications using Llama 4 Scout for the vision tier
View Llama 4 Maverick details

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro when:

  • Strongest open-weight benchmark scores available today
  • Code and math workloads
  • Self-hosted production with frontier-class quality
  • Single-model deployment preferred over fragmented Llama variants
View DeepSeek V4 Pro details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

It depends on your use case. Llama 4 Maverick from Meta excels at largest fine-tune ecosystem matters for your domain, while DeepSeek V4 Pro from DeepSeek is better for strongest open-weight benchmark scores available today. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does Llama 4 Maverick cost compared to DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Llama 4 Maverick costs Free input and Free output per 1M tokens. DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.74 input and $3.48 output per 1M tokens.

What is the context window difference between Llama 4 Maverick and DeepSeek V4 Pro?

Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens, while DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1M tokens.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide