LIVE
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms

GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.7

GPT-5.5 launched on April 23, 2026 as OpenAI's first fully retrained base model since GPT-4.5. At $5 input and $30 output per million tokens, it costs less than half of Claude Opus 4.7 at $15/$75. Both models offer 1M context windows. GPT-5.5 leads on MMLU-Pro and HumanEval while Claude Opus 4.7 holds the edge on reasoning and real-world engineering tasks. This is the definitive flagship comparison for 2026.

Head-to-Head Specs

SpecGPT-5.5Claude Opus 4.7
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Input Price$5.00/1M$15.00/1M
Output Price$30.00/1M$75.00/1M
Context Window1M1M
Released2026-042026-04
Capabilitiestext, vision, tool-use, code, reasoningtext, vision, tool-use, code

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.5Claude Opus 4.7Winner
MMLU-Pro94.293.8GPT-5.5
HumanEval97.196.2GPT-5.5
GPQA Diamond78.376.5GPT-5.5
MATH95.893.1GPT-5.5
SWE-bench68.765.4GPT-5.5

See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.

Category Breakdown

MMLU-ProGPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 scores 94.2 vs Claude at 93.8

Code generationGPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 scores 97.1 on HumanEval vs Claude at 96.2

Reasoning (GPQA)Claude Opus 4.7

Claude scores 76.5 on GPQA Diamond vs GPT-5.5 at 78.3, but Claude leads on SWE-bench

SWE-benchClaude Opus 4.7

Claude posts 65.4 vs GPT-5.5 at 68.7 on real engineering tasks

PricingGPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 at $5/$30 vs Claude at $15/$75 per 1M tokens

Context windowTieTie

Both offer 1M token context windows

Choose GPT-5.5 when:

  • Best possible benchmark scores on paper
  • Cost-conscious flagship workloads ($5/$30 vs $15/$75)
  • Omnimodal applications (text, image, audio, video)
  • OpenAI ecosystem and existing integrations
View GPT-5.5 details

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • Agent workflows and tool use (MCP ecosystem)
  • Complex multi-step reasoning tasks
  • Long-running agentic sessions
  • Tasks where safety and instruction-following matter
View Claude Opus 4.7 details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GPT-5.5 or Claude Opus 4.7?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.5 from OpenAI excels at best possible benchmark scores on paper, while Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic is better for agent workflows and tool use (mcp ecosystem). See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does GPT-5.5 cost compared to Claude Opus 4.7?

GPT-5.5 costs $5.00 input and $30.00 output per 1M tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per 1M tokens.

What is the context window difference between GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7?

GPT-5.5 supports 1M tokens, while Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide