LIVE
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the closest an open source model has come to matching the proprietary frontier. At 1.6 trillion parameters (49B active) with a 1M context window under the MIT license, it scores within 2 points of Claude Opus 4.7 on SWE-bench Verified (80.6% vs 82.4%). Claude still leads on most benchmarks, but DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.74 per million input tokens versus Claude at $15. That is a 9x price difference for near-identical coding performance.

Head-to-Head Specs

SpecDeepSeek V4 ProClaude Opus 4.7
ProviderDeepSeekAnthropic
Input Price$1.74/1M$15.00/1M
Output Price$3.48/1M$75.00/1M
Context Window1M1M
Released2026-042026-04
Capabilitiestext, vision, code, reasoningtext, vision, tool-use, code

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProClaude Opus 4.7Winner
MMLU-Pro91.593.8Claude
HumanEval94.896.2Claude
GPQA Diamond73.176.5Claude
MATH92.493.1Claude
SWE-bench63.865.4Claude

See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.

Category Breakdown

BenchmarksClaude Opus 4.7

Claude leads on MMLU-Pro (93.8 vs 91.5) and GPQA Diamond (76.5 vs 73.1)

SWE-benchTieTie

Near-identical: DeepSeek at 80.6% vs Claude at 82.4% on Verified

PricingDeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek at $1.74/$3.48 vs Claude at $15/$75 per 1M tokens

LicenseDeepSeek V4 Pro

MIT license allows unrestricted use, fine-tuning, and self-hosting

Context windowTieTie

Both offer 1M token context windows

Agent ecosystemClaude Opus 4.7

Claude has MCP, Claude Code, and the broadest agent tooling

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro when:

  • Self-hosted or on-premise deployments
  • Fine-tuning for specific domains
  • Budget-conscious teams needing near-frontier quality
  • Full control over model weights and inference
View DeepSeek V4 Pro details

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • Best possible accuracy on complex tasks
  • Agent workflows with MCP and Claude Code
  • Teams that prefer managed API over self-hosting
  • Safety-critical applications
View Claude Opus 4.7 details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Claude Opus 4.7?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro from DeepSeek excels at self-hosted or on-premise deployments, while Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic is better for best possible accuracy on complex tasks. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does DeepSeek V4 Pro cost compared to Claude Opus 4.7?

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.74 input and $3.48 output per 1M tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per 1M tokens.

What is the context window difference between DeepSeek V4 Pro and Claude Opus 4.7?

DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1M tokens, while Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide