Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
As of October 19, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 input and $25.00 output per 1M tokens, and Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 and $10.00. Gemini 2.5 Pro is the cheaper of the two. On the TensorFeed Intelligence Index's older 2024 benchmark set, Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.8 and Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 64.3 (as of October 25, 2026).
Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro are the two flagship models in 2026 with 1 million token context windows. They reach long context very differently. Anthropic prices at $5 input / $25 output per 1M tokens for the headline frontier-class scores. Google prices at $1.25 input / $10 output, accepting a benchmark gap in exchange for a quarter of the input rate and 40 percent of the output rate. The 1M context is the same; the rest of the tradeoff is where you spend.
Head-to-Head Specs
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Input Price | $5.00/1M | $1.25/1M |
| Output Price | $25.00/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Released | 2026-04 | 2025-03 |
| Capabilities | text, vision, tool-use, code | text, vision, tool-use, code, reasoning |
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench | 87.6 | 63.8 | Claude |
| MMLU-Pro | 93.8 | 91.2 | Claude |
| HumanEval | 96.2 | 93.8 | Claude |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.5 | 71.9 | Claude |
| MATH | 93.1 | 90.5 | Claude |
See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.
Category Breakdown
Opus 4.7 at 93.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro at 91.2
Opus 4.7 at 96.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro at 93.8
Opus 4.7 at 65.4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro at 59.4
Opus 4.7 at 76.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro at 71.9
$5.00/$25.00 for Claude Opus 4.7 against $1.25/$10.00 for Gemini 2.5 Pro, per 1M input/output tokens
Both ship native 1M token context.
Gemini supports text, vision, audio, video natively. Opus 4.7 is text and vision.
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:
- ▸Frontier-class reasoning quality matters more than per-token cost
- ▸Coding agents that need top SWE-bench scores
- ▸Research agents working with dense scientific content
- ▸Workloads where Anthropic is already integrated
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when:
- ▸High-volume long-context workloads where price dominates
- ▸Multimodal applications with audio or video input
- ▸Workloads already on Google Cloud / Vertex AI
- ▸Cost-sensitive 1M context use cases
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic excels at frontier-class reasoning quality matters more than per-token cost, while Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google is better for high-volume long-context workloads where price dominates. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.
How much does Claude Opus 4.7 cost compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 input and $25.00 output per 1M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens.
What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M tokens.
Which scores higher on the TensorFeed Intelligence Index, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher. Claude Opus 4.7 scores 69.8 and Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 64.3 on the older 2024 benchmark set (as of October 25, 2026).