LIVE
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms
ANTHROPICOpus 4.7 benchmarks published2m ago
CLAUDEOK142ms
OPUS 4.7$15 / $75per Mtok
CHATGPTOK89ms
HACKERNEWSWhy has not AI improved design quality the way it improved dev speed?14m ago
MMLU-PROleader Opus 4.788.4
GEMINIDEGRADED312ms
MISTRALMistral Medium 3 released6m ago
GPT-4o$5 / $15per Mtok
ARXIVCompositional reasoning in LRMs22m ago
BEDROCKOK178ms
GEMINI 2.5$3.50 / $10.50per Mtok
THE VERGEFrontier Model Forum expansion announced38m ago
SWE-BENCHleader Claude Opus 4.772.1%
MISTRALOK104ms

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro are the two flagship models in 2026 with 1 million token context windows. They reach long context very differently. Anthropic prices at $15 input / $75 output per 1M tokens for the headline frontier-class scores. Google prices at $1.25 input / $10 output, accepting a benchmark gap in exchange for an order of magnitude lower per-token cost. The 1M context is the same; the rest of the tradeoff is where you spend.

Head-to-Head Specs

SpecClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input Price$15.00/1M$1.25/1M
Output Price$75.00/1M$10.00/1M
Context Window1M1M
Released2026-042025-03
Capabilitiestext, vision, tool-use, codetext, vision, tool-use, code, reasoning

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProWinner
MMLU-Pro93.891.2Claude
HumanEval96.293.8Claude
GPQA Diamond76.571.9Claude
MATH93.190.5Claude
SWE-bench65.459.4Claude

See the full benchmark leaderboard for all models.

Category Breakdown

General reasoning (MMLU-Pro)Claude Opus 4.7

Opus 4.7 at 93.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro at 91.2

Code generation (HumanEval)Claude Opus 4.7

Opus 4.7 at 96.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro at 93.8

SWE-benchClaude Opus 4.7

Opus 4.7 at 65.4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro at 59.4

Graduate-level science (GPQA)Claude Opus 4.7

Opus 4.7 at 76.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro at 71.9

PricingGemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro at $1.25/$10 vs Opus 4.7 at $15/$75. ~10x cheaper.

Context windowTieTie

Both ship native 1M token context.

MultimodalGemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini supports text, vision, audio, video natively. Opus 4.7 is text and vision.

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 when:

  • Frontier-class reasoning quality matters more than per-token cost
  • Coding agents that need top SWE-bench scores
  • Research agents working with dense scientific content
  • Workloads where Anthropic is already integrated
View Claude Opus 4.7 details

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro when:

  • High-volume long-context workloads where price dominates
  • Multimodal applications with audio or video input
  • Workloads already on Google Cloud / Vertex AI
  • Cost-sensitive 1M context use cases
View Gemini 2.5 Pro details

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic excels at frontier-class reasoning quality matters more than per-token cost, while Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google is better for high-volume long-context workloads where price dominates. See the full comparison above for detailed benchmarks and pricing.

How much does Claude Opus 4.7 cost compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15.00 input and $75.00 output per 1M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 input and $10.00 output per 1M tokens.

What is the context window difference between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M tokens.

More Comparisons

Interactive Compare ToolAll ModelsFull Pricing Guide