{"ok":true,"count":33,"last_updated":"2026-09-06","filters":{},"policies":[{"id":"eu-digital-omnibus-ai","title":"Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)","jurisdiction":"EU","type":"regulation","status":"active","enacted_date":"2026-07-08","effective_date":"2026-07-27","summary":"Targeted amendment to the EU AI Act that defers high-risk obligations (stand-alone Annex III systems to 2027-12-02, Annex I product-embedded systems to 2028-08-02), eases some SME and documentation duties, and adjusts transitional rules for marking AI-generated content, while leaving the 2026-08-02 Article 50 transparency date in place.","source_url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/oj/eng","citations":["https://lawandtechnology.eu/en/digital-omnibus-on-ai-official-journal-regulation-2026-1744/","https://www.gibsondunn.com/eu-ai-act-omnibus-agreement-postponed-high-risk-deadlines-and-other-key-changes/"],"scope":["high-risk","transparency","general"]},{"id":"cn-anthropomorphic-ai-measures","title":"Interim Measures for the Administration of AI Anthropomorphic Interactive Services","jurisdiction":"China","type":"regulation","status":"active","enacted_date":"2026-04-10","effective_date":"2026-07-15","summary":"Rules from the CAC and four other ministries (NDRC, MIIT, MPS, SAMR) for AI companion and human-like interactive services in mainland China: mandatory security assessments for launch and for services above one million registered or 100,000 monthly active users, a ban on virtual intimate-relationship services for minors, protections for elderly users, and content and training-data governance duties.","source_url":"https://www.cac.gov.cn/2026-04/10/c_1777558395078289.htm","citations":["https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2026/china/china's-new-regulations-on-ai-anthropomorphic-interactive-services","https://www.hunton.com/privacy-and-cybersecurity-law-blog/chinas-first-regulatory-framework-for-virtual-companions-soon-to-take-effect"],"scope":["consumer-protection","safety","transparency"]},{"id":"us-eo-14365-national-ai-framework","title":"EO 14365: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence","jurisdiction":"US-Federal","type":"executive-order","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-12-11","effective_date":"2025-12-11","summary":"Trump executive order directing a federal push against state AI laws: creates a DOJ AI Litigation Task Force to challenge state statutes, orders Commerce to list 'onerous' state AI laws within 90 days, conditions BEAD broadband funds on state compliance, and asks the FCC and FTC to consider preemptive federal standards, while carving out child safety, data-center infrastructure, and state procurement.","source_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/16/2025-23092/ensuring-a-national-policy-framework-for-artificial-intelligence","citations":["https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/trump-signs-executive-order-to-preempt-state-ai-laws","https://www.paulhastings.com/insights/client-alerts/president-trump-signs-executive-order-challenging-state-ai-laws"],"scope":["general","consumer-protection"]},{"id":"us-ca-sb-53","title":"California SB 53: Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (TFAIA)","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-09-29","effective_date":"2026-01-01","summary":"California's frontier-model law, the successor to the vetoed SB 1047. Requires developers of frontier models (trained above 10^26 FLOPs) to publish safety frameworks, report critical safety incidents to the state, and protect whistleblowers; large frontier developers (over 500M dollars revenue) face additional duties. Also creates CalCompute. Signed by Governor Newsom 2025-09-29; most requirements effective 2026-01-01.","source_url":"https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/09/29/governor-newsom-signs-sb-53-advancing-californias-world-leading-artificial-intelligence-industry/","citations":["https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53"],"scope":["frontier-models","safety","transparency"]},{"id":"us-ai-action-plan-2025","title":"Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan (plus three companion executive orders)","jurisdiction":"US-Federal","type":"guidance","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-07-23","effective_date":null,"summary":"White House policy plan required by EO 14179, listing over 90 federal actions across innovation, infrastructure, and international diplomacy and security, released alongside executive orders on accelerating AI data-center permitting, promoting exports of full-stack American AI, and 'Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government' procurement rules.","source_url":"https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Americas-AI-Action-Plan.pdf","citations":["https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2025/07/the-white-house-releases-ai-action-plan","https://datamatters.sidley.com/2025/07/30/the-trump-administrations-2025-ai-action-plan-winning-the-race-americas-ai-action-plan-and-related-executive-orders/"],"scope":["general","national-security","public-sector"]},{"id":"eu-gpai-code-of-practice","title":"EU AI Act General-Purpose AI Code of Practice","jurisdiction":"EU","type":"guidance","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-07-10","effective_date":"2025-08-02","summary":"Voluntary code prepared by independent experts to help providers of general-purpose AI models demonstrate compliance with the EU AI Act. Has three chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety and Security); the Safety and Security chapter applies only to GPAI models with systemic risk under Article 55. Published 2025-07-10; GPAI obligations applied from 2025-08-02.","source_url":"https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/contents-code-gpai","citations":[],"scope":["transparency","safety","frontier-models"]},{"id":"us-tx-traiga-hb-149","title":"Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA, HB 149)","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-06-22","effective_date":"2026-01-01","summary":"Comprehensive Texas AI statute with an intent-based liability framework. Bars AI systems built to unlawfully discriminate, manipulate behavior, or produce certain unlawful content; requires state agencies to disclose when citizens interact with AI; restricts biometric capture. Attorney General has exclusive enforcement with a 60-day cure period, no private right of action. Signed 2025-06-22, effective 2026-01-01.","source_url":"https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/pdf/HB00149I.pdf","citations":["https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?Bill=HB149&LegSess=89R"],"scope":["general","discrimination","consumer-protection","public-sector"]},{"id":"jp-ai-promotion-act","title":"Japan AI Promotion Act (Act on Promotion of Research and Development and Utilization of AI-Related Technologies)","jurisdiction":"International","type":"statute","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-05-28","effective_date":"2025-06-04","summary":"Japan's first AI-specific statute, taking an innovation-first, soft-law approach. Sets national AI policy principles and establishes an AI Strategy Headquarters within the Cabinet, but imposes no direct fines or prohibitions; the government may issue guidance, request information, or publicly name non-compliant actors. Passed 2025-05-28, mostly effective 2025-06-04, in full effect September 2025.","source_url":"https://www.gov-online.go.jp/hlj/en/november_2025/november_2025-08.html","citations":[],"scope":["general","safety"]},{"id":"cn-ai-content-labeling","title":"Measures for Labeling AI-Generated Synthetic Content","jurisdiction":"China","type":"regulation","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-03-14","effective_date":"2025-09-01","summary":"Cyberspace Administration of China rule requiring both explicit (visible) and implicit (metadata) labels on AI-generated text, images, audio, video, and virtual assets distributed on Chinese platforms, paired with the mandatory national standard GB 45438-2025. Issued 2025-03-14, effective 2025-09-01.","source_url":"https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-03/14/c_1743654684782215.htm","citations":["https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/ai-labeling/"],"scope":["deepfakes","transparency"]},{"id":"us-eo-14179-trump","title":"EO 14179: Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence","jurisdiction":"US-Federal","type":"executive-order","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-01-23","effective_date":"2025-01-23","summary":"Trump executive order rescinding EO 14110 and directing the development of an AI Action Plan focused on US AI leadership. Removed Biden-era reporting requirements; directed agencies to identify and rescind AI policies seen as inconsistent with US leadership goals.","source_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/31/2025-02172/removing-barriers-to-american-leadership-in-artificial-intelligence","citations":[],"scope":["general","national-security"]},{"id":"kr-ai-basic-act","title":"South Korea AI Basic Act (Framework Act on the Development of AI and Establishment of Trust)","jurisdiction":"International","type":"statute","status":"active","enacted_date":"2025-01-21","effective_date":"2026-01-22","summary":"South Korea's comprehensive AI framework law, the second national comprehensive AI regime after the EU. Imposes transparency duties on generative and high-impact AI, safety obligations for high-impact systems, and establishes a national AI policy structure and an AI Safety Institute. Promulgated January 2025, effective 2026-01-22, with a roughly one-year enforcement grace period on fines.","source_url":"https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2026-02-20/south-korea-comprehensive-ai-legal-framework-takes-effect/","citations":[],"scope":["general","high-risk","transparency","safety"]},{"id":"us-ca-ab-2013","title":"California AB 2013: Generative AI Training Data Transparency","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"active","enacted_date":"2024-09-28","effective_date":"2026-01-01","summary":"Requires developers of generative AI systems used by Californians to publicly post a summary of the data used to train each system. Disclosure must include data source descriptions, copyright status, and license terms where known.","source_url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2013","citations":[],"scope":["transparency"]},{"id":"us-ca-sb-942","title":"California SB 942: AI Transparency Act","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"active","enacted_date":"2024-09-19","effective_date":"2026-08-02","summary":"Requires covered providers of generative AI systems (over one million monthly users) used by Californians to offer a free public AI-detection tool and to embed manifest and latent disclosures in generated content. AB 853 (2025) moved the operative date from 2026-01-01 to 2026-08-02 and added large-online-platform provenance duties from 2027-01-01 and capture-device duties from 2028-01-01.","source_url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB942","citations":["https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB853"],"scope":["transparency","deepfakes"]},{"id":"us-il-hb-3773","title":"Illinois HB 3773: AI in Employment (Human Rights Act amendment)","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"active","enacted_date":"2024-08-09","effective_date":"2026-01-01","summary":"Amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to make it a civil-rights violation for an employer to use AI that discriminates based on protected characteristics in recruitment, hiring, promotion, discipline, or discharge, including via zip-code proxies, and to require employee notice when AI is used in such decisions. Effective 2026-01-01.","source_url":"https://www.ilga.gov/Legislation/BillStatus?DocNum=3773&GAID=17&DocTypeID=HB&SessionID=112&GA=103","citations":[],"scope":["workplace","discrimination","transparency"]},{"id":"eu-ai-act-prohibited-practices","title":"EU AI Act Prohibited Practices (Article 5)","jurisdiction":"EU","type":"regulation","status":"active","enacted_date":"2024-07-12","effective_date":"2025-02-02","summary":"The first binding phase of the EU AI Act to take effect: from 2025-02-02 the Article 5 bans on unacceptable-risk practices (manipulative AI, exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, certain predictive policing, untargeted facial-image scraping, and emotion recognition in workplaces and schools) apply across the EU. Enforceable by member-state authorities from 2025-08-02.","source_url":"https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/5/","citations":[],"scope":["high-risk","discrimination","deepfakes","general"]},{"id":"sg-genai-governance-framework","title":"Singapore Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI","jurisdiction":"International","type":"guidance","status":"active","enacted_date":"2024-05-30","effective_date":null,"summary":"Voluntary framework from Singapore's Infocomm Media Development Authority and the AI Verify Foundation, extending the earlier Model AI Governance Framework to generative AI. Sets out nine dimensions (including accountability, content provenance, security, and testing) for a trusted GenAI ecosystem. Non-binding guidance.","source_url":"https://www.imda.gov.sg/resources/press-releases-factsheets-and-speeches/press-releases/2024/public-consult-model-ai-governance-framework-genai","citations":["https://aiverifyfoundation.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Model-AI-Governance-Framework-for-Generative-AI-19-June-2024.pdf"],"scope":["general","transparency","safety"]},{"id":"intl-seoul","title":"Seoul AI Safety Summit Outcomes","jurisdiction":"International","type":"declaration","status":"active","enacted_date":"2024-05-21","effective_date":"2024-05-21","summary":"Second AI Safety Summit (Seoul, May 2024) producing the Seoul Declaration plus a multilateral Frontier AI Safety Commitments document signed by 16 leading AI companies pledging risk thresholds and incident reporting.","source_url":"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/seoul-declaration-for-safe-innovative-and-inclusive-ai-ai-seoul-summit-2024","citations":[],"scope":["safety"]},{"id":"intl-un-ai-resolution","title":"UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/78/265 on Safe, Secure and Trustworthy AI","jurisdiction":"International","type":"declaration","status":"active","enacted_date":"2024-03-21","effective_date":null,"summary":"First UN General Assembly resolution on artificial intelligence (draft A/78/L.49), adopted by consensus and co-sponsored by 125 states with the US in the lead. Promotes safe, secure, and trustworthy AI for sustainable development and calls for bridging digital divides. Non-binding.","source_url":"https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/78/265","citations":["https://press.un.org/en/2024/ga12588.doc.htm"],"scope":["general","safety"]},{"id":"us-ut-hb-333","title":"Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act (HB 333)","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"active","enacted_date":"2024-03-13","effective_date":"2024-05-01","summary":"Establishes the Utah Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy and a regulatory mitigation program (sandbox), and clarifies that consumer-protection laws apply to acts performed by generative AI on behalf of regulated entities.","source_url":"https://le.utah.gov/~2024/bills/static/HB0333.html","citations":[],"scope":["consumer-protection","transparency"]},{"id":"uk-ai-safety-institute","title":"UK AI Safety Institute Establishment","jurisdiction":"UK","type":"agency-action","status":"active","enacted_date":"2023-11-02","effective_date":"2023-11-02","summary":"Government-funded body within DSIT focused on pre-deployment frontier-model safety evaluation, conducting voluntary access agreements with major labs. Renamed AI Security Institute in 2025.","source_url":"https://www.aisi.gov.uk/","citations":[],"scope":["safety","national-security"]},{"id":"intl-bletchley","title":"Bletchley Declaration on AI Safety","jurisdiction":"International","type":"declaration","status":"active","enacted_date":"2023-11-01","effective_date":"2023-11-01","summary":"Joint declaration from 28 countries plus the EU at the inaugural AI Safety Summit, recognizing risks from frontier AI and committing to inclusive cross-border safety research. Non-binding.","source_url":"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-summit-2023-the-bletchley-declaration/the-bletchley-declaration-by-countries-attending-the-ai-safety-summit-1-2-november-2023","citations":[],"scope":["safety","national-security"]},{"id":"cn-genai-provisions","title":"Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services","jurisdiction":"China","type":"regulation","status":"active","enacted_date":"2023-07-13","effective_date":"2023-08-15","summary":"Cyberspace Administration of China rule for public-facing generative AI services in mainland China. Requires algorithm filings, security assessments, content review, and adherence to 'core socialist values' in model outputs.","source_url":"http://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm","citations":[],"scope":["transparency","safety","public-sector"]},{"id":"uk-pro-innovation-paper","title":"UK 'Pro-Innovation' AI Regulation Approach","jurisdiction":"UK","type":"guidance","status":"active","enacted_date":"2023-03-29","effective_date":"2023-03-29","summary":"Sectoral, principles-based UK approach: existing regulators (ICO, CMA, FCA, etc.) apply five cross-cutting principles (safety, transparency, fairness, accountability, contestability) within their remits, no horizontal AI statute. Updated by subsequent government responses.","source_url":"https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-regulation-a-pro-innovation-approach","citations":[],"scope":["general","safety","transparency"]},{"id":"us-nist-ai-rmf","title":"NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0, NIST AI 100-1)","jurisdiction":"US-Federal","type":"guidance","status":"active","enacted_date":"2023-01-26","effective_date":null,"summary":"Voluntary US framework from the National Institute of Standards and Technology for managing risks in the design, development, and use of AI. Organized around four functions (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage). Companion Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1) was released 2024-07-26. Widely referenced as a de facto baseline in US and global AI governance.","source_url":"https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework","citations":["https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.600-1.pdf"],"scope":["general","safety","transparency"]},{"id":"cn-deep-synthesis-provisions","title":"Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services","jurisdiction":"China","type":"regulation","status":"active","enacted_date":"2022-11-25","effective_date":"2023-01-10","summary":"Pre-dates the GenAI Provisions and remains in force. Requires labeling of synthetic media (deepfakes, voice clones, generated text), provider security assessments, and registration of deep-synthesis services.","source_url":"http://www.cac.gov.cn/2022-12/11/c_1672221949354811.htm","citations":[],"scope":["deepfakes","transparency"]},{"id":"eu-ai-act","title":"EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689)","jurisdiction":"EU","type":"regulation","status":"phased","enacted_date":"2024-07-12","effective_date":"2024-08-01","summary":"First comprehensive horizontal AI law. Risk-tiered: unacceptable-risk practices prohibited from 2025-02-02; general-purpose AI obligations from 2025-08-02; Article 50 transparency duties and the general body of the Act from 2026-08-02. The Digital Omnibus on AI (Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, in force 2026-07-27) deferred the high-risk obligations: stand-alone Annex III systems to 2027-12-02 and high-risk AI embedded in Annex I regulated products to 2028-08-02.","source_url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ%3AL_202401689","citations":["https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/","https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/package-digital-package/file-digital-omnibus-on-ai"],"scope":["general","high-risk","transparency","discrimination"]},{"id":"us-co-sb26-189","title":"Colorado SB 26-189: Automated Decision-Making Technology","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"pending","enacted_date":"2026-05-14","effective_date":"2027-01-01","summary":"Repeals and replaces the 2024 Colorado AI Act with a narrower framework for automated decision-making technology that materially influences consequential decisions: pre-use notice and disclosure duties, consumer correction and appeal rights, three-year record keeping, exclusive Attorney General enforcement with a 60-day cure period, and a sunset on the cure provision in 2030.","source_url":"https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb26-189","citations":["https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en-us/knowledge/publications/18733d31/colorado-enacts-revised-ai-law","https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2026/05/colorado-governor-signs-sb-189"],"scope":["high-risk","consumer-protection","discrimination"]},{"id":"us-ny-raise-act","title":"New York RAISE Act (Responsible AI Safety and Education Act, S6953B / A6453B)","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"pending","enacted_date":"2025-12-19","effective_date":"2027-01-01","summary":"Second US state frontier-model safety law after California. Requires large frontier developers (frontier models above 10^26 FLOPs, developer revenue over 500 million dollars) to publish safety and security protocols, report critical safety incidents to the state within 72 hours, and creates an oversight office within the Department of Financial Services. Signed 2025-12-19; the agreed chapter amendment (S8828 / A9449, Chapter 96 of 2026) was signed 2026-03-27 and aligns definitions with California's SB 53. Takes effect 2027-01-01.","source_url":"https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S6953","citations":["https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-signs-nation-leading-legislation-require-ai-frameworks-ai-frontier-models","https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S8828"],"scope":["frontier-models","safety","transparency"]},{"id":"us-ca-sb-1047","title":"California SB 1047: Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"vetoed","enacted_date":"2024-09-29","effective_date":null,"summary":"Would have imposed safety testing, kill-switch, and incident-reporting requirements on frontier AI models above a defined compute and cost threshold. Passed the legislature, vetoed by Governor Newsom on 2024-09-29.","source_url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1047","citations":["https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/SB-1047-Veto-Message.pdf"],"scope":["safety","high-risk"]},{"id":"us-bis-ai-diffusion-rule","title":"BIS Framework for Artificial Intelligence Diffusion","jurisdiction":"US-Federal","type":"regulation","status":"rescinded","enacted_date":"2025-01-13","effective_date":"2025-05-15","summary":"Biden-era Bureau of Industry and Security export-control framework (interim final rule 2025-01-13) that would have set tiered country lists, per-country compute caps, and validated end-user license pathways for AI model weights and advanced compute. BIS announced its rescission on 2025-05-13, before the 2025-05-15 compliance date, and issued three guidance documents on chip diversion and Chinese model training instead. A formal replacement rule had not been published as of September 2026.","source_url":"https://www.bis.gov/press-release/department-commerce-rescinds-biden-era-artificial-intelligence-diffusion-rule-strengthens-chip-related","citations":["https://www.bis.gov/press-release/department-commerce-rescinds-biden-era-artificial-intelligence-diffusion-rule-strengthens-chip-related"],"scope":["export-controls","national-security","high-risk"]},{"id":"au-mandatory-guardrails","title":"Australia: Mandatory Guardrails for AI in High-Risk Settings (Proposals Paper)","jurisdiction":"International","type":"guidance","status":"rescinded","enacted_date":"2024-09-05","effective_date":null,"summary":"Australian Government proposals paper (Department of Industry, Science and Resources, 2024-09-05) setting out 10 proposed mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings alongside a Voluntary AI Safety Standard. The National AI Plan released 2025-12-02 shelved the mandatory guardrails, opting to rely on existing technology-neutral laws and voluntary guidance, and funded an Australian AI Safety Institute to advise on targeted reforms.","source_url":"https://consult.industry.gov.au/ai-mandatory-guardrails","citations":["https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/national-ai-plan"],"scope":["high-risk","safety","general"]},{"id":"us-co-sb24-205","title":"Colorado SB 24-205: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence","jurisdiction":"US-State","type":"statute","status":"rescinded","enacted_date":"2024-05-17","effective_date":null,"summary":"First comprehensive US state AI statute as enacted in 2024, imposing risk-management and impact-assessment duties on developers and deployers of high-risk AI in consequential decisions. Its effective date was pushed from 2026-02-01 to 2026-06-30 by SB 25B-004 (2025-08-28), and it was then repealed and replaced before taking effect by SB 26-189 (signed 2026-05-14), a narrower automated-decision-making transparency law operative 2027-01-01.","source_url":"https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb24-205","citations":["https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb26-189","https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25b-004"],"scope":["high-risk","consumer-protection","discrimination"]},{"id":"us-eo-14110-biden","title":"EO 14110: Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence","jurisdiction":"US-Federal","type":"executive-order","status":"rescinded","enacted_date":"2023-10-30","effective_date":"2023-10-30","summary":"Biden-era executive order setting reporting requirements for foundation models above a compute threshold (10^26 FLOPs), AI safety testing standards via NIST, and obligations across federal agencies. Rescinded by EO 14179 on 2025-01-20.","source_url":"https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/01/2023-24283/safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence","citations":["https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/"],"scope":["general","safety","transparency","national-security"]}],"attribution":{"source":"TensorFeed editorial AI policy registry","policy":"Each entry summarizes a publicly-published government action. Source URLs link to the canonical government publication. Summaries are TensorFeed editorial; the underlying acts/orders/regulations themselves are government publications and free to use under their respective public-records terms (US federal works are public domain; EU and UK government works are reproduced under their open-government terms with citation).","primary_sources":["federalregister.gov (US executive orders + regulations)","leg.colorado.gov, leginfo.legislature.ca.gov, le.utah.gov (US state statutes)","eur-lex.europa.eu (EU regulations)","gov.uk (UK guidance and agency actions)","cac.gov.cn (China CAC regulations)"]}}